Worldviews 2013 Conference – Toronto

Tonight is the opening keynote for the Worldviews 2013 conference.  Adrian Monck (World Economic Forum) is speaking on public trust in the media and how this affects higher education.  The conference investigates the relationship between higher education and the media – issues of MOOCs, knowledge mobilization, internationalization and more… Thursday and Friday’s sessions look great – I will personally be attending talks on journalism and education hubs.  Full agenda here

Ontario Research Policy Symposium – May 16, 2013

This Thursday, I am helping Glen Jones and the higher education program at University of Toronto host a research symposium on key policy issues facing Ontario’s post-secondary system.  This event is being co-organized by Lucia Padure (MTCU) and Richard Wiggers (HEQCO).  I am looking forward to the first presentation Life After High School – presenting the findings of a recent research study into students’ first year at PSE.  There will also be info on college-uni transfer, institutional diversity/differentiation, and student choice.  One of the goals of the day is to spark a network of stakeholders interested in Ontario’s PSE research.  If you’re interested in watching the event online – join us at 9:30 Thursday morning.

Regime change in Venezuela means uncertain future for higher ed

Picture of Venezuela University ProtestThanks to my colleague Elliot Storm at the University of Toronto, I have been learning a lot about the state-university relationship in Venezuela.  The two have been at odds in the past decade and with the death of Hugo Chavez, the future is uncertain.  Will the government continue to implement university change in a forceful way or work together with the institutions to develop sustainable higher ed?   Read our article in University World News here.

The Values-void in Branch Campuses

It is always discouraging to start a research project only to find that the phenomenon you want to study just doesn’t exist.  That was the case when I set out to categorize and evaluate the mission and vision statements of Western branch campuses in education hubs.  Turns out the majority of branch-campuses out there don’t have any reference to a mission or vision statement.  Quite the blow to my neatly organized project.

My first reaction was to expound weakly that the accepted absence of something that is pretty standard in a parallel education context is worth studying.  But when I actually looked at the sample websites of the branch campuses there enough simlarity to suggest that official mission/vision statements were missing but unofficially the majority of branch campuses are marketing themselves to the same tune.  They say the same things, offer the same programs and are trying to capture the same students.  I definitely found enough to research and would like to encourage cross-border educators to be more explicit about why the do what they do.

The study has just been released in the following article:

Grace Karram.  (2012) “A futile search for values and pedagogy? A discursive analysis of the   marketing messages of branch-campuses in higher education hubs.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, (Online First)

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03057925.2012.728373

Globe and Mail – where’s the answer?

The globe and mail is currently publishing a series of articles in which stakeholders question Canadian PSE.  They are asking if it is relevent, if it should be open source, if students are hirable, if teaching if effective, if universities are innovative… and more.  This seems to be stemming from the slight decrease that Canadian schools saw in recent global rankings.I would like to suggest that any evaluation needs to be based in previous objectives – how is Canadian education doing what it has set out to do.  And if the evaluators wish to critique the objectives then a bigger debate is necessary about what we are doing in Canadian PSE.  If the objectives change for Canada, then global rankings may not be all that important as indicators.

How many of you have moved home after uni? No shame in staying home!

This infographic from Sarah Wenger (collegathome.com) makes an important point – the status of moving away is not worth the debt.  Leaving home for university/college has become a status symbol of the middle class whether or not students can afford it.  True, many students are forced to re-locate for certain programs or due to their distance from an institution, but many leave just because it is a “coming of age” tradition.  Why not just buy a nice car and spend some money at coffee shops so you get the break you need from parents’ home and can still afford life after school.  More importantly, the shift away from home can isolate and dislocate young adults from their social communities.  Lots of students move back home after failing to succeed in their first year – a failure that may not have been necessary if students had remained imbedded in their home networks.  I’ve just had a baby girl and I’m preparing to ramp up this rant so I am very convincing in 18 years!

OECD Economic Survey critiques Canada for poor innovation in spite of high PSE indicators

Picture of OECD SurveyOn Thursday, June 14 – I helped Glen Jones and the higher education group at OISE host the authors of the recent OECD Economic Survey of Canada.   Though the survey was criticized for saying little new about Canadian innovation or PSE – the suprise was that report seemed to suggest PSE was the solution to the poor innovation.

Here’s are my thoughts in University World News – OECD Survey finds post-secondary strong….

Safe to study in Canada?

May was a tumultuous month for Canadian higher education.  The ongoing student protests in Quebec have been gripping to follow and have presented new opportunities for  student-government negotiations. But the recent murder of Jin Lun may have deeper ramifications – on an international scale.  As an international student, his murder has led to the Chinese embassy warning their citizens to take extra cautions in traveling to Canada.  Reponses from local institutions are countering the embassy’s warning saying Canada is a safe and welcoming place.  But this is the second Chinese students this year to be killed and those statements ring a little hollow.

I am reminded of the Canadian tourists who have been killed recently in travels to Mexico.  There may be only a handful in the overall tourist population – but it is not an easy thing to convince the rest of us that Mexico is safe for Canadians.

The bigger questions coming out of China’s cautionary statements need to be addressed – is there something that is making Chinese international students vulnerable?  Perhaps a degree of isolation?  Are these crimes racially motivated?

Jane Ngobia’s study – on the interaction of international and domestic students at UofT’s campuses – suggests that domestic students benefit and learn from their interactions with international students.  However, the category of international students
is perceived as broad and often includes other Canadian minority students who
add diversity to campus.  With growing numbers of Canadian-Chinese students as well as international – it is not just the international students that stand out.  If indeed the recent crimes are racially-motivated, then both visibleminority populations are at risk.  A
warning from the Chinese embassy is not enough – Ngobia calls for concerted policies to build relationship and provide continued supports for all our “diverse” students.

OECD Economic Survey of Canada – discussion at OISE June 14

On Wednesday, June 13th the OECD will be releasing it’s Economic Survey of Canada.  The following day, Glen Jones will be hosting two of the authors (Peter Jarrett and Alexandra Bibbee) to discuss the chapters that relate to post-secondary education and innovation.  The event will pair the authors with OISE scholars to engage on issues related to Canada’s economic future.

EVENT: Thursday, June 14th   9:30 – 11:00 am,  OISE Library (Ground Floor, 252 Bloor Street Toronto)